Sometimes
the real news slips in through the
cracks. You have to keep your eyes open for it, though.
For
instance, in the midst of all the propaganda about progress in Afghanistan, and how Afghans are at least better off now than they were before the 2001 invasion, there
is this “human interest” story which reported that Afghan Sikhs and Hindus have
asked the UN for asylum, because they felt persecuted in the country of their
birth. In fact, they felt so persecuted that they said they were better off
under the Taliban.
Imagine that. Non-Muslims saying they were better off under the Taliban.
How
do we know this? Straight from the horse’s mouth:
“To tell you the truth, we are not as
happy under [Afghan President Hamid] Karzai as we were under the Taliban,” said
Awtar Singh Khalsa, leader of the All Afghan Hindu and Sikh Community Council..."We face discrimination, and we face threats, so life is worse for us” than before the U.S. invasion.
Afghan Sikhs |
So, just how bad do things have to get if people actually say they were better off under the Taliban?
Very, very bad.
Apparently, they can't even die, because nobody will let them cremate their dead in peace, or go out at night from their temple after prayers because "knife-wielding robbers" lie in wait. One imagines said robbers would've received summary justice from the Taliban.
The
figures are stark enough: Back in the early nineties, when the mujahideen had
rolled into Kabul, there had been some twenty thousand Afghan Hindus and Sikhs.
Today, there are about three thousand – and they
are desperate to leave. And, more to the point, most of those who have left
have done so not during the years of Taliban rule, but in the last eleven years
of “freedom”, imposed by the Empire.
Afghan Hindu Family |
Interesting,
isn’t it?
It
gets even more interesting when you take into account the fact that, in 2001, the Taliban
had made the Hindus and Sikhs of Afghanistan wear yellow badges to mark
themselves. I remember, back in the late nineties, the orchestrated howls of
outrage when this happened, with comparison to Nazi Germany’s forcing the Jews
to wearing yellow badges. But the Taliban’s logic was relatively straightforward,
and, if one put aside preconceptions for a moment, almost sane by their
standards: since Hindus and Sikhs weren’t Muslims, they didn’t have to follow
the religious code imposed on the rest of the Afghan people. Therefore, wearing
badges in public merely safeguarded them from harassment for not following the
said religious code.
I’m
fairly certain that this “safeguarding” was followed more in the breach than
the observance, but the fact remains that the Afghan Hindus and Sikhs would
evidently prefer the evil Taliban rule than the benevolent democracy fostered
by the gentle touch of Western bombs and boots on the ground.
Irony
isn’t dead; not at all.
Tha gals will argue with you - the Emprie, the Taliban, and the Northern A-Lackeys are all of a kind:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.rawa.org/rawa/2010/03/07/emancipation-of-afghan-women-not-attainable-as-long-as-the-occupation-taliban-and-national-front-criminals-are-not-sacked.html
just sighs and shakes head
ReplyDeletethanks Bill
btw axisoflogic.com 4 shooters in us shooting of Sikhs
Carina
I'm intrigued that the Afghan Sikhs and Hindus can't even die now. Has immortality finally been invented, I wonder?
ReplyDeleteIrony indeed. In the end changing one form of domineering patriarchy for another was never going to be good for anyone except perhaps for those oil corporates who benefit from having their profits accessible again.