Intro:
This article is meant as a description of a sequence of events to help the reader understand the
current so-called “war” in Gaza, and to find one’s way through the many dense
layers of lies and propaganda.
For the purposes of this article, I shall
use the terms “Israel” and “Israeli” instead of “Zionistan”, the term I prefer; but
the use of those terms do not signify any legitimisation or approbation of the
Zionist entity.
I shall – for the purposes of this section of the article – treat
HAMAS as an organisation independent of Zionist control. I shall discuss that point further in the concluding section of this article.
The reason I am doing this not to pretend
that there can be some kind of moral equivalence between a racist apartheid
“nation” with billions yearly in aid from the American Empire on one side, and
the inmates of a starved open-air concentration camp on the other. This is so
any reader who wishes to can cite this article, or copy it, to other
discussions without being accused of bias.
I repeat: you are welcome to cite or copy this article elsewhere.
I strongly recommend you follow up the links I have provided in the text and at the end - they provide additional information that is beyond the scope of this article.
I repeat: you are welcome to cite or copy this article elsewhere.
I strongly recommend you follow up the links I have provided in the text and at the end - they provide additional information that is beyond the scope of this article.
So let us begin.
*******************************
In general, the Israeli propaganda machine,
and those who repeat its claims, say that the aggression against Gaza is
justified to prevent HAMAS rockets from falling on Israeli cities. Let’s
examine this claim.
It is perfectly true that HAMAS is firing
Qassam rockets at Israeli cities. It is completely true that Israeli families
have hidden in bomb shelters from the incoming rockets.
Nothing else about Israeli claims is true.
Before we go further, let me mention a word
about these Qassam rockets. They aren’t guided ballistic missiles or anything of that
nature. What they are, is a steel tube packed with fertiliser as propellant,
and sometimes (not always) with a crude warhead at the other end. When the
propellant is ignited, the rocket – hopefully – takes off from the launching
rails without crashing, and flies through the air until said propellant runs
out and it falls on something. If there is a warhead, and if the rocket strikes
the ground at an angle that impacts the nail (which is generally what is used
as a striker), the warhead may or may not explode. If it does explode, the usual damage is a smear of black powder residue.
The statistics make it clear: Israelis are
more likely to die from peanut allergies
than Qassam fire.
What is the military utility of the
Qassams? Nothing. What is their non-military
value? Immense. The Qassam is a symbol of continued resistance, that oppression
and blockade haven’t destroyed the will to fight back.
But, as I said, in military terms the Qassams’
value is less than negligible. And if we are to take the Israeli claim about
the effectiveness of their Iron Dome defence at face value – something which
reputable scientists have dismissed – the value of the Qassams drops to
farcical levels. This is not the equivalent of the US’ Ukrainian allies
rocketing and shelling Lugansk, something the White House seems perfectly willing to let
go on.
But, the HAMAS did fire Qassams without provocation on Israel, right? They did
provoke the current round of violence?
Let’s see!
If we aren’t to take the route of arbitrarily
declaring that a certain point is the “beginning” of the sequence of events
leading to a particular situation – something that has been called “Historical Creationism” and is meant to point blame in one particular direction – we should
take a longer view. We should start further back in time and see how things led
up, action begetting reaction, to the situation of the moment.
The Beginning:
If there is a point where the story begins,
it could be 2006, when HAMAS won a free
and democratic election in Gaza. This was greeted by shock in Western
capitals, which had aided in the election in the fond belief that the
Palestinians would vote for the hyper-corrupt and effete Fatah in preference
over HAMAS. Discord over the election resulted in an internecine HAMAS-Fatah
civil war in 2007, in which Fatah was eliminated in Gaza and HAMAS virtually
ceased to exist in the West Bank.
This was followed by a punishment Israeli (and
Egyptian) blockade of Gaza, meant to, in the words of an Israeli minister, “put
Gaza on a diet” for having the temerity to back HAMAS. This “diet” was quite
literal, with a per capita limit of 2279 calories per day. Also,
All exports were banned, and just 131 truckloads of foodstuffs and other essential products were permitted entry per day. Israel also strictly controlled which products could and could not be imported. Prohibited items have included A4 paper, chocolate, coriander, crayons, jam, pasta, shampoo, shoes and wheelchairs.
Apparently, shoes et al were “dual use items” – as was A4 paper, and presumably coriander and jam could only be used to “feed terrorists”, who would then attack on wheelchairs with shampoo bottles firing crayons, if one were to go by the Israeli “logic”. Also, Gaza fishermen were restricted to a narrow coastal zone, which rapidly became depleted of fish due to the inevitable overfishing involved.
Not
surprisingly, this could not sustain the population of Gaza, and smuggling
rapidly became a major industry. Since Gaza is a tiny territory, under constant
Israeli control and surveillance (even after the 2005 Israeli “withdrawal” from
the territory), there was no way to carry out this smuggling except via
tunnels. These tunnels, from Gaza’s border with Egypt – the only non-Israel
border the strip has – rapidly became a major conduit for all supplies, and the
Gazans became expert at tunnel-building. Time magazine even did a photo feature on them.
I
repeat – these tunnels were built in the first place as a direct response to
the Israeli blockade, because it was the only way the people of Gaza could
survive in anything resembling civilised conditions.
These
tunnels also suited HAMAS fine, because it could tax all the smuggling activities
and raise funds from them. (It must not be imagined for a moment that HAMAS
was, or is, the only resistance group in the Gaza Strip – there is also Islamic
Jihad, which is no friend of HAMAS, and several smaller outfits. This should be
kept in mind.)
“Mowing the lawn”:
Roughly
every two years after imposing their blockade, the Israelis have launched major
attacks on Gaza. It happened in 2008, in which over a thousand Palestinians
were killed, and again in 2012, in which 139 Palestinians died. In between,
there were more, indeed constant, minor attacks on Gaza. On each occasion, the
overwhelming majority of casualties were Palestinian civilians, something
difficult to understand in view of the Israeli pretence of having a “moral army”
which “goes to extreme lengths to avoid civilian casualties.” In fact, as we shall see, what is
remarkable is not that civilians were killed, but that – for a nation claiming
that HAMAS presented a threat to its very existence – Israel went to great
lengths not to destroy HAMAS.
Had it been determined to end Hamas rule it could easily have done so, particularly while Hamas was still consolidating its control over Gaza in 2007, and without necessarily reversing the 2005 disengagement. Instead, it saw the schism between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority as an opportunity to further its policies of separation and fragmentation, and to deflect growing international pressure for an end to an occupation that has lasted nearly half a century.
Israel called this process of regular
attacks “mowing the lawn”. Apparently no one chose to notice that this reduced
the Palestinians to the status of grass.
But HAMAS accepted a ceasefire after the
2012 “mowing”, and not only did it adhere to this ceasefire for over nineteen months, it prevented the other Palestinian resistance groups in Gaza from attacking Israel. It even stopped
peaceful protests against Israel.
I repeat: from 2012 to 2014, HAMAS was
in total ceasefire mode with Israel, despite constant provocations. Not only
was it in ceasefire, it enforced the ceasefire on Islamic Jihad and other
resistance groups.
HAMAS and the
Syrian “Civil War”:
One of the few nations that had stood by
HAMAS and the Gaza resistance was Bashar al Assad of Syria, as well as his
ally, Iran. Now, the ideological mentor of HAMAS is the Muslim Brotherhood, the
organisation which had been suppressed throughout North Africa from Algeria to
Libya to Egypt, and in Syria as well. In the wake of the so-called “Arab Spring”
in 2011, as various old tyrants were overthrown by what seemed to be a tide of
democracy, the Muslim Brotherhood scored an important victory. The dictator of
Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, was overthrown by a popular revolution, and a MB led
government replaced him. Life became easier for Gaza residents, with the MB
significantly easing the blockade and in fact pressuring Israel to an early
ceasefire when it last attacked Gaza in 2012.
At the same time, in Syria, the violence
was escalating as terrorist gangs sponsored by Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and
NATO attempted to take over the country. HAMAS – at the time based in Damascus –
made a blunder so colossal that it has, to date, never recovered from it and
perhaps never will. It chose to believe the fantasy that Assad’s fall was
imminent and inevitable (something I, a mere foreigner half a world away, had
at the time accurately stated was neither) and ditched him for Qatar. HAMAS men
began using the techniques taught them by Hizbollah against Hizbollah, as at the battle of Al Qusayr, a turning point
in the conflict. All this swiftly led to the funds being provided by Iran and
Syria drying up – and Assad showed no signs of falling.
Soon enough, there was more trouble with
Qatar, too, when in a very murky episode the HAMAS leadership was asked to
leave the country. And in Egypt, the MB government was overthrown by a military
dictatorship under al Sisi, one so aggressively anti-MB that it was far more
anti-HAMAS than the earlier Mubarak dictatorship had been.
So, from having the full support of
Syria and Iran and at least being tolerated by Egypt, HAMAS – by its own
blunders – suddenly ended up with no friends whatsoever, bar the doubtful “friendship”
of Israel’s friend and ally Turkey. It had no money and no way to make any
more. Even the old reliable tunnel network had collapsed since the al Sisi
dictatorship was aggressively demolishing them. By early 2014, HAMAS was on the
ropes; unable to pay salaries of the Gaza employees, the economy almost
nonexistent, sewage accumulating in the streets, massive daily power cuts,
rising popular discontent, and no way out except a unity deal with its arch
rival, Fatah.
Unity moves
with Fatah:
Ever since the 2007 break with Fatah,
there had been several attempts to forge a unity government. The closest that
it came to one was in 2011, but went nowhere. But now, in 2014, with the
situation in Gaza turning increasingly desperate, HAMAS decided to form a unity
government with its arch rival. In real terms it was an unconditional surrender
for HAMAS, since it accepted almost completely the Fatah positions (which in
turn were dictated to Mahmoud Abbas by Israel). HAMAS wouldn’t even have a
single cabinet post in this unity government, so total was its surrender. All
it would gain in return was continued control over the Gaza strip and the
reopening of the border crossing with Egypt, no more.
Not too surprisingly, this was greeted
with relief by a lot of people in the West, including the US, which had grown
increasingly uneasy at the situation in Gaza. In April, the agreement was
signed, and on the 2nd June, the government was inaugurated.
With barely a protest from the Islamists, Abbas repeatedly and loudly proclaimed that the government accepted the Middle East Quartet’s demands: that it recognise Israel, renounce violence and adhere to past agreements. He also announced that Palestinian security forces in the West Bank would continue their security collaboration with Israel.
It did not, however, suit the Israeli
government at all. All this time, the
Israeli attempt had been to play off the Palestinians against each other, but a
unity government would put an end to the game and put real pressure on the
Netanyahu regime to allow a Palestinian state, something the Israeli prime
minister had stated he would never allow. It became imperative to find a way to
sabotage the unity government.
The opportunity came not in Gaza, but in
the West Bank.
All this time, the West Bank remained
under the corrupt and effete Fatah “government” – the Palestinian Authority, as
it is called, though it has no authority – of Mahmoud Abbas. The security
services of this “government” acted in close alliance with the Israeli forces –
so much so that the West Bank people joke bitterly that they’re enduring two
occupations, one by Israel and one by the PA. In the West Bank there is no
armed resistance activity; with few exceptions, the only weapons are in the
hands of the “security services”. Not a single Qassam has been launched from
the West Bank. And in return for this the West Bank people are rewarded with...
...massive, constant Israeli settlement
construction – which always takes the best land from the Palestinians – with institutionalised apartheid (Arabs are not permitted to use roads meant for settlers, for example); “security
walls” which cut off villages from their fields and children from their
schools; over five hundred military
checkpoints; “price tag” attacks from
settlers; the destruction of their olive groves and houses in mass punishments;
and no prospect of ever gaining independence as a reward for their “good behaviour”.
Please keep this in mind when you hear
any Israeli claim that they are interested in living peacefully alongside the Palestinians.
They simply are not.
Professor Ilan Pappé has said that
Israel made a conscious decision to become a racist apartheid state instead of
a democratic one. Today, ultra-right, openly racist and fascist opinion is
rising in Israel, with chants of “Death to Arabs” even at football matches.
This should not be forgotten either.
In May, on the day commemorating the
Nakba – the Palestinian Holocaust of expulsion by Israel in 1948 – there were
demonstrations in support of hunger-striking Palestinian prisoners in the West
Bank. Israeli troops opened fire with live ammunition, killing two unarmed Palestinian teenagers. The incident was captured on closed circuit TV, and after initial
denials the Israelis fell into sullen silence, not admitting the murders but
unable to plausibly continue to deny them.
The kidnappings:
Some days later, on 11th
June, Israel bombed Gaza, killing two Palestinians – one of them a ten year old
boy. The very next day, three settler teenagers were kidnapped in the West
Bank. Israel, without providing any proof whatsoever, immediately blamed HAMAS
for the kidnappings – though HAMAS denied any involvement. Despite knowing –
from a phone call made by one of the kidnapped teenagers – that they were
almost certainly dead, Israel lied (even to the parents, as they later
testified), and launched a massive and aggressive “search operation” in the
West Bank. Hundreds of Palestinians were arrested, including over sixty
released as part of a previous prisoner swap for the captured Israeli soldier
Gilad Shalit. Nine Palestinians were killed, and houses demolished and looted.
During this time Abbas’ PA security forces worked in close collaboration with
the Israelis.
Much later, the teenagers were found dead – only a short distance from where they were kidnapped – and by tourist guides at that. Apparently the “thorough”
search wasn’t thorough enough to check the neighbourhood
of the kidnap. In response, the Israeli government immediately announced three
more settlements in the West Bank.
Let me mention at this point that all
these settlements are clearly illegal
under international law.
Meanwhile, in Israel and the West Bank,
ultra-right racist Jewish organisations had been hard at work, stoking up
anti-Palestinian hatred. Straight from
an anti-Arab demonstration, six of these ultra-right Jews attempted to kidnap a
Palestinian boy but failed - because the nine-year-old boy's mother began hitting the attempted kidnapper over the head with her cellphone. Can you imagine the paeans in the media if it had been an Israeli mother protecting her son from Arabs? I think you can.
It wasn't enough deterrence. The next day they returned, successfully abducted Muhammad Abu-Khdeir, poured petrol into his mouth, and burned him to death.
It wasn't enough deterrence. The next day they returned, successfully abducted Muhammad Abu-Khdeir, poured petrol into his mouth, and burned him to death.
Even at this stage, HAMAS did not
retaliate. Despite
being repeatedly attacked, falsely accused of the kidnap of the teenagers (even
the Israeli police later admitted HAMAS had had nothing to do with the kidnappings), it
still did not retaliate. The nineteen-month ceasefire was still on.
The Qassams begin:
The facts show that Israel, as one
article laconically states, had to work quite hard to get HAMAS to end its
ceasefire. That finally happened on 7th July, when it bombed a HAMAS
group in a tunnel inside Gaza. This group had had nothing to do with attacking
Israeli positions.
Between 01:00 and 16:00, the bodies of 5 members of the ‘Izziddin al-Qassam Brigades (the armed wing of Hamas) were recovered from a tunnel dug near Gaza International Airport in the southeast of the southern Gaza Strip town of Rafah. They were identified as: Ibrahim Dawod al-Bal’awi, 24; ‘Abdul Rahman Kamal al-Zamli, 22; Jum’a ‘Atiya Shallouf, 26; and Khaled ‘Abdul Hadi Abu Mur, 21, and his twin brother, Mustafa. Another three members were recovered alive, but one was in a serious condition.
Only then – after being repeatedly
attacked in the West Bank as well as Gaza – did HAMAS retaliate; and the
retaliation was by the Qassams, which, as we have seen, are utterly useless for
all practical purposes.
That
they are useless isn’t even a matter of opinion – the Israeli reaction proves they are useless. While simultaneously
claiming that they are an existential threat, Israel reacted angrily to
international flights being held back from its airports; apparently the
existential threat wasn’t threatening enough to potentially harm its tourist
industry. And while Qassams were touted as a massive threat, Israelis were
sitting out on hillsides cheering the bombing of Gaza – exposed to these same
Qassams.
Therefore the sequence of events,
leading up to the invasion of Gaza, clearly shows that not only was HAMAS not to blame, but that at every stage,
the Palestinians were reacting to
Israeli provocation.
Let me also repeat a point I made
earlier: HAMAS is not the only resistance group active in Gaza. There’s Islamic
Jihad and several smaller groups; and even Israel admitted that HAMAS had stopped them rocketing Israeli cities. An attack blamed on HAMAS is not necessarily
an attack launched by HAMAS, or even an attack HAMAS knew about or had any
sympathy for.
It's a different matter that right now the various resistance groups are standing together against the enemy offensive - but not surprising. It's United We Stand and Divided We Fall; and if the Israeli attack is one thing which will bring the resistance together permanently, so much the better for it.
It's a different matter that right now the various resistance groups are standing together against the enemy offensive - but not surprising. It's United We Stand and Divided We Fall; and if the Israeli attack is one thing which will bring the resistance together permanently, so much the better for it.
*******************************************
Having handled the sequence of events up
to the launch of Qassams, which Israel cites as the casus belli of its war massacre in Gaza, let me move on to
some other points.
The HAMAS human
shield myth:
When
all else fails, the Israeli counterargument about Gaza hinges a few shopworn
arguments:
The
first is the argument that HAMAS uses human shields and stores weapons in
mosques and houses. That this is not true isn’t even a new thing: it was
exposed several years ago, by Amnesty International among others, which said
that the only instances of human shield use had been by Israelis. HAMAS did not, and has not now, used human shields. That is a lie. Nor has it stored weapons in homes or mosques except on two occasions
when it stored weapons in empty UNRWA
schools – UNRWA condemned the incident, and nobody has ever found any evidence
that it was repeated.
Actually, this is by no means a new Israeli tactic. It had accused Hizbollah of similar tactics in 2006 – and then, too, it was conclusively proved by Human Rights Watch that Israel was lying. In fact, there is so much evidence piling up on this that this is something even Israeli Hasbara propagandists are becoming wary of citing.
(There's an interesting twist to this; as one of the few old Zionists still alive, Uri Avnery, says, in the Israeli "war of independence" it was the Jewish groups which hid weapons in schools, hospitals and synagogues.)
Nor is it true that the Israelis "warn" the people to flee before bombing their house. Often they don't, and even when they do, there is neither time to run or anywhere to run to.
The tunnels:
Another
argument is that HAMAS used its tunnels to attack Israelis. This is a strange argument
– apparently invented post facto – after the Qassam excuse didn’t wash as well
as it seemed it would. I have been able to only find one instance of Palestinians –
perhaps HAMAS, perhaps someone else – attacking a kibbutz using the tunnels;
and that was on 17th July, ten
days after the beginning of full scale hostilities. Since the tunnels have been around for many years, it's, in any case, at least disingenuous to pretend that they are a proximate cause for attacking Gaza.
The
tunnels, as I said, were originally invented for smuggling, not for fighting;
but they do seem to have been used with increasing effectiveness by the
resistance to target the Israeli attackers. In retaliation, it is the Israelis
who have been killing Palestinian civilians; that over 80% of Palestinian
casualties have been civilians is proof, if any were needed, who is actually
striking at civilian targets. In contrast almost all Israeli dead and wounded
have been military personnel.
It is,
in fact, the phenomenon of Gazan resistance and Israel’s retaliatory massacres
of civilians that has led to the attackers’ destruction of the strip’s only
power station; it was to drain Gaza’s laptops and mobile phones of power so
that the people of the strip could no longer Tweet and Instagram photos and
appeals for assistance to the world. Massacres are difficult to continue if
exposed to the world in real time.
That this kills babies is incidental, of course.
That this kills babies is incidental, of course.
The ceasefire:
The
third Israeli argument is that HAMAS rejected a peace proposal – a ceasefire “proposed”
by Egypt. It was a ceasefire HAMAS was never going to accept, and for excellent reasons. First, it was not consulted at all on what terms it was ready to
accept; it has said repeatedly that what it wants is a lifting of the blockade.
Secondly, the ceasefire was rubber stamped by the Egyptian dictator al Sisi,
the man most responsible for the plight of the Gazans – much more so than even
the Israelis. Third, though the proposal was rubber stamped by Egypt, it was an
Israeli proposal, which gave Gaza nothing at all in return for ceasing
hostilities. It would be a return to the status quo ante, as was the case in
2012. As we have seen, though the Gazans honoured the ceasefire, it was the
Israelis who broke it. There is absolutely no reason to imagine it would be
different this time round.
In
return, HAMAS – and, very significantly, Islamic Jihad – made a
counter-proposal; they would offer a ten-year ceasefire in response for lifting the blockade and other minor concessions. The response from the other
side? Dead silence.
At
the moment, fighting continues, and another “ceasefire” was broken within two
hours by the Israelis, citing the “capture” of one of its soldiers. HAMAS has
denied that it captured the soldier; in any case, the Israelis prefer to murder their own troops rather than let them be captured, as it seems to have done in this case. And seeing the number of
times the Israelis have lied, it is by no means impossible that this “capture”
is nothing more than another lie meant to continue the fighting.
In any case, the Israeli insistence on demolishing the tunnels is somewhat bizarre. Tunnels, surely, can be easily re-constructed when demolished? Isn't someone bright enough to have thought of that? And, in the exposed Gaza strip, tunnels are not just vital to the defence - they are the only way the defence can be conducted. As Uri Avnery says, HAMAS uses the tunnels for "...attacks, command posts, operational centers (sic) and arsenals."
As bizarre as this tunnel fixation is the Israeli insistence that it, and it alone, has the right to decide what a "ceasefire" entails. Thus, after declaring a 72-hour ceasefire, it still sent troops to attack a tunnel, apparently in the belief that it can destroy Palestinian infrastructure with impunity, but it's a ceasefire violation when the resistance fights back. That is at least delusional.
Either way, we can more or less say with confidence that the invasion isn't going anywhere near as well as the Israelis thought.
In any case, the Israeli insistence on demolishing the tunnels is somewhat bizarre. Tunnels, surely, can be easily re-constructed when demolished? Isn't someone bright enough to have thought of that? And, in the exposed Gaza strip, tunnels are not just vital to the defence - they are the only way the defence can be conducted. As Uri Avnery says, HAMAS uses the tunnels for "...attacks, command posts, operational centers (sic) and arsenals."
As bizarre as this tunnel fixation is the Israeli insistence that it, and it alone, has the right to decide what a "ceasefire" entails. Thus, after declaring a 72-hour ceasefire, it still sent troops to attack a tunnel, apparently in the belief that it can destroy Palestinian infrastructure with impunity, but it's a ceasefire violation when the resistance fights back. That is at least delusional.
Either way, we can more or less say with confidence that the invasion isn't going anywhere near as well as the Israelis thought.
************************************
A word about HAMAS:
Throughout
this article, I have treated HAMAS as an independent resistance movement, “terrorist”,
if you will, but independent. Actually, it was nothing of the kind. According to Uri Avnery, it was set up with the knowledge and tacit encouragement of Shin
Bet (the Israeli military intelligence service, more honest and less murderous
than Mossad). According to other sources, the Israeli involvement in setting it
up was much more direct. Either way, HAMAS – at least in its upper echelons –
is far from being as independent of the Israelis as most people believe.
There’s
an interesting little fact. For all the talk about how HAMAS is “sworn to
destroy Israel”, the Israelis have actually taken great care not to destroy or
even seriously harm the group. In fact, even in the current confrontation, Netanyahu wants HAMAS to stay.
If you look at it, the
only side that really wins in this conflict is...HAMAS. Israel is well on the way to becoming a
pariah state, its propaganda collapsing, with huge numbers even in Europe now
turned firmly against its racist apartheid policies. However, HAMAS, the raison d’ĂŞtre of Israel’s
continuing blockade of Gaza – HAMAS, which was on the ropes only months ago –
has suddenly regained its lost position as the only defender of the
Palestinians (excepting Islamic Jihad and minor groups). While Mahmoud Abbas
continues to do nothing in the West Bank, HAMAS is steadily fighting the
Israeli war machine to a virtual standstill. Who wins here?
I am
not saying that Israel is deliberately sacrificing its soldiers to strengthen
HAMAS. Even Netanyahu is not so stupid as that. The resistance of the lower
ranks of HAMAS is real and effective; they didn’t melt away as the regime in
Jerusalem thought they would. Increasingly, the Israelis are looking at a
no-win situation. They aren’t losing though; not yet. Not as long as the US
empire continues paying them, no questions asked.
The
ones who are actually losing are the people of Gaza; but apart from the
copy-pasted, hypocritical comments of Hasbara propagandists, nobody in a position of power cares about
them.
Copyright B Purkayastha 2014