Apologies if this isn't up to my usual standards, but I did it directly on MS Paint in half an hour instead of my normal technique of first drawing it on paper in pencil, then scanning and processing it, etc.
Wednesday, 28 September 2016
2 comments:
Full comment moderation is enabled on this site, which means that your comment will only be visible after the blog administrator (in other words, yours truly) approves it. The purpose of this is not to censor dissenting viewpoints; in fact, such viewpoints are welcome, though it may lead to challenges to provide sources and/or acerbic replies (I do not tolerate stupidity).
The purpose of this moderation is to eliminate spam, of which this blog attracts an inordinate amount. Spammers, be warned: it takes me less time to delete your garbage than it takes for you to post it.
Proceed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hard to know whom to believe.
ReplyDeleteMost logical explanation, Ukraine said they would be sending a bomber to turn the rebels into Guernica, made sure the rebels knew the flight path of the 'bomber', then ordered MH17 to follow that path. Fault on both sides, and plausible.
Russia says they have radar that proves the missile was from Ukrainian space, but Denmark says Russia never handed it over. Russia want US satellite images, but US refuses (no reason given, not necessary to respond to the Red Menace).
A mess, a tragedy, and Ukraine is not without fault, but were the rebels also at fault? Not clear.
MichaelWme
But was it an unbiased investigation?
ReplyDelete