Lover Of Freedom
One of the few positives of der Trümpfer
taking power in the Imperialist States is how the liberals are exposing their
own hypocrisy. One easy example is the Iraq invasion of 2003. As you may
recall, throughout the Bush years, liberals kept insisting that Bush was a war
criminal and that the invasion was a crime. This was of course true; yet the
moment Obama took over, those same liberals seemed to forget all about calling
Bush to account for said crime, and when Obama made not the slightest move to
prosecute the war criminals filling the Bush administration, there wasn’t the
slightest cheep from them. And when one of the primary instigators of
Amerikastan’s imperialist wars, Killary Klingon, was a candidate against der Trümpfer,
these same liberals rushed to her support, some of them hilariously calling her
a “candidate of peace”.
A few days ago, when der Trümpfer announced
a 90-day suspension of visas from seven Muslim countries (using a list prepared
by his none too illustrious predecessor), liberals stormed the airports in
Amerikastan, allegedly in support of Muslims. This struck a few people as a
mite odd, since Barack Hussein Obama had spent every single day of his eight years in power bombing Muslims,
unleashing jihadis on them, and, yes, suspended all visas from Iraq for six
months...and not one of these liberals said a word. Not one.
The apogee of this flaming
hypocrisy was the case of one Hamid Khalid Darweesh. This Darweesh was an
interpreter who assisted the imperialist Amerikastani occupation forces during
the first (2003-11) Occupation of Iraq, and who was detained for 17 hours at
JFK airport in New York after the visa ban. According to the same liberals –
including several I’ve been acquainted with online for a decade – who had
opposed the Iraq invasion as a crime, this Darweesh was suddenly a “hero” who
had “risked his life” in the service of “freedom”.
As I said elsewhere:
No imperialist conquest in history has ever
worked - not one- without the aid of local collaborationists. No imperialist
conqueror ever has enough manpower to maintain an empire without these vermin.
These are the real enablers of colonialism. Twenty thousand Brits ruled 300
million Indians for almost 200 years because of these Quislings. I recall when
in 2003 America invaded Iraq it was scum like Ahmed Chalabi and Kanan Makiya
who were the cheerleaders of the invasion, and the
vermin who fed and served the invaders who acted as America's enablers. Like
these translators. Today, the same liberal hypocrites who ten years ago were
still condemning the Iraq invasion are calling Darweesh a "hero" who
"risked his life for freedom" - simply because Trump's temporary visa
ban stopped him from entering America for 17 hours. This is beyond vile.
As vile as liberal hypocrisy, perhaps.
In case the reference to “Hajji
bitch” might confuse anyone, it’s a racist term used by the Occupation in
Iraq...and also used in cartoons by the likes of that great liberal Garry
Trudeau of Doonesbury, who spent eight years with eyes screwed tightly shut
where Obama’s war crimes and drones were concerned.
**********************
Slava Poroshenko!
Meanwhile in Ukraine...
As you probably do not know, since
it’s not probably being talked about in the news obsessed by meaningless
vagina-hat-wearing liberal tantrums, the Ukranazi regime installed by Obama in
Kiev has launched a massive attack on the liberated areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk
People’s Republics. There’s been massive shelling of Donetsk city and other
places, such as the town of Avdiivka, and numerous civilians killed. The
resumption of the war seems imminent.
If Ukraine’s so-called President,
Petro Poroshenko, thinks he is going to retake the two republics of the
Donbass, he is of course totally mistaken. The LPR and DPR forces, which had
fought off the Ukranazis in 2014, are much stronger now, and the Ukranazi
regime, never more than a shambolic alliance of fascist thugs and corrupt
oligarchs, is weaker than ever. But the idea is not to win the war or capture
the Donbass. Not even the most delusional Ukranazi imagines that is possible.
No, the clear and obvious purpose
of this is to create a crisis that would sabotage any normalisation of ties
between Russia and America. It is the prospect of this normalisation that is
hated and feared by the War Industry in America, and the entire purpose of the ludicrous
claim that der Trümpfer is a Russian “puppet”. After all the effort and expense
that went into organising the Nazi coup that installed the current criminals in
Kiev, the very prospect of losing their investment makes the War Industry shiver.
And Poroshenko, whose own approval ratings rival those of genital herpes,
desperately needs a boost. War is a nice, albeit short term, boost. That it
will end in his ragtag army being slaughtered in the snow matters to Poro not
at all.
Make no mistake – the targets of
the renewed war is not the Donbass, but
1. A Russia-America rapprochement
which would result in lowered tensions, the reduction of force levels, and
possibly the de facto dismantling of NATO, an alliance without a purpose not
except aggressive imperialist war.
And
2. The European Union. The EU was
always a target of the regime change in Ukraine, though its pusillanimous,
mindless so-called leaders, like the horrendous Angela Merkel of Germany,
pretended otherwise. Being colonial vassals of the American Empire, when America
ordered them to jump, they jumped, putting sanctions against Russia which hurt
them much more than the Russians – sanctions which, indeed, have turned out to
be a blessing for Russia. Now, after several years, even the European worm is turning,
and one by one the Merkelite scum – like the war criminal Francois Hollande of
France – are being turfed out. If things continue in this way, the prospect of
the EU rising in revolt against its Amerikastani overlords and dismantling the
sanctions. A new round of fighting in Ukraine, in which the inevitable Ukranazi
rout will be as inevitably blamed on yet another Invisible Invasion by Russia,
is the only thing that might arrest that.
About sanctions against Russia - everything isn't unambiguous, benefit or evil. A controversial issue... About purposes of the new war, which Poroshenko wants to do again, you are right.
ReplyDeleteSt Hillary promised she would do for Syria the same beneficent favour she did for Libya, a favour that, according to the UK, saved millions of lives. The evil dictator Putin said he would not allow that, so St Hillary promised regime change in both Syria and Russia.
ReplyDeleteTrump said he would renege on America's promise to promote Democracy and Freedom (meaning that US plutocrats must be free to take anything from anywhere in the world, and any government that hinders them must be replaced by a Democratic government, meaning one appointed by the president of the US), and managed to win the Electoral College with some rust belt votes that no one foresaw (except for the author of the Dilbert comic strip). As a candidate, Trump condemned Obama's not vetoing a toothless Security Council motion against Israeli colonies.
And now Trump is demanding that Israel stop building colonies, and is also promising 'no fly zones' in Syria of the 'We came, we saw, he died,' kind, and that, unless Russia returns the Ukraine and promises to stop supporting the ethnic Russians in the east of Ukraine, and also hands all its Syrian military assets over to NATO, the US will have to force regime change on Russia.
Looks like them what voted against Secretary Redbeard are going to get her, anyway. More Democracy and Freedom for the world.
And I've read many comments that regime change in Russia will be even easier than regime change in Libya, that the Soviet military collapsed with the USSR, and Russia is now on a par with Grenada. Surely the top US military advisers can't be wrong about that?
MichaelWme
Le Monde has a new site called Le Décodex that distinguishes real news sites from fake news sites. http://www.lemonde.fr/verification/
ReplyDeleteThe New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, & etc are all legitimate. One can trust everything written there. Put them into Le Décodex and they come out green, meaning 100% reliable.
Sott.net is, of course, a fake news site, "An unreliable site that hosts conspiracy theories," so it appears in red.
The journalists at sott.net, as they admit, go to places like Syria and report what they actually see, and, from the example of a football game where no fan saw a gorilla run across the field, we know that what ordinary people see with their own eyes is all fake, just Syrian government propaganda. We all know the White Helmets were unjustly denied the Nobel Peace Prize for their work helping the innocent, peaceful, unarmed pro-democracy activists in al-Qaeda and the Daesh who were attacked by the evil Syrian and Russian regimes. They also provide the required medical assistance at executions of those convicted in fair trials for murder by al-Qaeda and the Daesh, another contribution toward peace in the world. We all hope the Nobel Committee corrects its mistake this year.
Real news comes from US/UK/EU government information offices and the brave documentary makers in Port Said who filmed the atrocities committed by the evil Syrian and Russian regimes in Aleppo (Aleppo is clearly visible from Port Said) until they were stopped by the evil dictator al-Sisi.
Le Décodex has another category for sites like rt.com, which comes out yellow, since it has a few real news stories mixed in with Russian propaganda.
I'm sure everyone will rely on Le Décodex to distinguish real news from fake news.
MichaelWme