“Those who cannot remember the past are
condemned to repeat it.” ~ George Santayana
(T)he United States (has the right) to
intervene militarily to secure its "vital interests" which include(d),
"ensuring uninhibited access to key markets, energy supplies, and
strategic resources”. ~ US National
Security Strategy, 1997, known as the Clinton
Doctrine.
History goes in cycles.
That might not be apparent in an age where
history is falsified, mythologised, and misrepresented almost as it happens,
but it is true for all that. And, of course, like all cycles, the same conditions
throw up the same consequences, again and again.
I’m reminded, more and more, these days of
two past periods. Neither of them was all that long ago, and one doesn’t have
to be a specialist historian to be able to understand what I’m talking about.
The first phase is what I’ll call the late imperialist era, circa 1880 to
1910. What was the world like then?
The great scramble for colonies was
virtually over. Apart from a few countries, like Afghanistan or Ethiopia, or
were too difficult to conquer and administer economically, or were too poor and
isolated to make it worth the effort, like Nepal, all of Asia and Africa was
colonised by European regimes. China, while nominally independent, was in
thrall to Western business interests. Central and much of South America, too,
were independent only in name, being treated almost as colonies by the emerging
power of the US. There were, in practical terms, no new lands left to conquer
and enslave. But the reasons for
colonialism did not go away just because there were no new colonies to conquer.
What were these reasons?
First and foremost was the economic engine
driving the Industrial Revolution which, actually, gave Europe the ability to
colonise the world. This reliance on
heavy industry needed two things – a cheap source of raw material to supply the
factories, and a guaranteed market for the products of those factories.
Colonies supplied both. The natives could be compelled to extract the raw
material at low or nonexistent wages, they would be shipped back to the home
country for making cloth or whatever, and then the manufactured product would
be shipped back to be sold to the natives, who had absolutely no choice in the
matter and no alternative market to buy them from.
The second was the need to protect the
colonies themselves, and to provide ports of call on the way to the home
country for ships to refuel, take on fresh food and water, and so on. This
required ports and facilities in strategically located islands and other
coastal territories. In turn, both the colonies and the bases needed military
forces to garrison them and protect them from local uprisings as well as
depredations from other colonial regimes.
Colonialism was, of course, always a
capitalism-driven enterprise; and profits had to be not just made but
constantly increased, as in all capitalist enterprises. Therefore, since there
were no new lands to colonise, the only recourse was to take territories by
force from each other. The Spanish American war and the Russo-Japanese war were
just two wars of the period the only purpose of which was to take someone else’s
colonies. The growing importance of oil as a strategic material made colonies
where it was found even more of a valuable possession.
That the colonial regimes were aware of the
dangers of a conflagration are evident; they reacted by forming networks of
entangling military alliances which theoretically would prevent war by
deterring the “other side” from making any aggressive move. Of course, what
this actually did was allow the minor participants of one alliance to imagine
that they could get away with whatever they wanted to do against the other
side, in the expectation that the rest of the alliance would bail them out.
We know where that all ended up – the First
World War.
The second phase is the 1930s Fascist period. The First World
War destroyed several empires and created a large number of new nations, most
of which were small, weak, economically devastated by the war, and filled with
huge numbers of demobilised jobless young men with military training. Under
these circumstances, they quite naturally gravitated towards right wing
Messiahs who promised to lead them out of their troubles. Ethnic and religious
minorities served as handy targets for venting their pent up passions, since
they were too weak and isolated to fight back. Militaries were built up, history
was falsified and mythologised, and the soldier became an object almost of
worship. These days most people imagine that Hitler, Franco and Mussolini were
the only fascist dictators of the time, but, in reality, almost all of Europe
between France and the USSR barring Scandinavia was then controlled by fascist
regimes of one stripe or another. And the Western democracies had no problem
allying with these fascist regimes at all; it was the fascist regime of Poland getting
a guarantee of help from Britain and France that led to the Second World War.
Today, once again, fascist movements are
growing all over Europe. The 1990s, like 1919, saw countries splinter or get
artificially vivisected, creating a large number of small weak nations filled
with jobless and angry young people. Once again fascist political movements
raised their heads. Once again they began targeting vulnerable ethnic and
religious minorities – Roma and Muslim this time instead of Roma and Jews – as an
outlet for popular anger. Once again the “democratic” west allied happily with
fascism whenever it suited them, as we saw in 2014 with the Nazis in Ukraine. And
once again the West allies with small nations which are therefore encouraged to
aggressive behaviour, as we saw in Georgia in 2008, and as we’re seeing again
in the Balkans.
And, also, today the neo-colonial project
is in full tide in Africa and Asia. Once again, the Europeans and Americans are
racing to colonise the world, using cheap labour to suck out raw materials at
throwaway prices, working to ensure captive markets, and creating an empire of
bases to protect their imperial investments. It’s as though the post-Second
World War phase of decolonisation never happened.
So, what we are seeing is a double
recurrence of the two historical periods that led to the First and Second World
Wars – together. With the logic of capitalist greed still paramount, can we
possibly say that a third world war can’t happen again? We are already on the
brink of it, in Syria and Ukraine. Only, this time the world is led by people
who seem to actually believe that they can “create their own reality”.
Once the war comes, as it almost certainly
will, there won’t be anyone left to say “I told you so”.
[Image Source] |
Bill,
ReplyDeleteYes, there will be nobody left to say; "told you so". I also am certain there will be a WW3. Wish like hell I am wrong, but doubt that I am. Like you, it is damn hard to be positive about the chances of peace in this world of ours. And yet, it would be so easy to have real peace. If we just treated each other as we want to be treated. No, I am not religious in any way, and that way of living, do unto others, predates all known religions, my opinion, others may vary.
I still have as one of my top favorite songs of my life time, "Imagine" by the late/great John Lennon. Of course "Give Peace a Chance" is a very close number 2.
Congratulations on the book deal. Keep us informed as to when it will be for sale and if possible, the cost. About time you got published my friend.