So what’s
been going on in the great Republic of Hindunazistan since I sent you the last
despatch from the front lines?
Plenty, of course; so much that I won’t
even bother with most of it, entertaining as it might be, with tales of state
elections involving prima donna politicians – believe me, Indian politicians
can put Donald Trump to shade in egotism without even trying – or the travails
of so-called sports stars, heat waves and the like. This particular Despatch
will confine itself to discussing two major “scandals” which have consumed
media time and attention over the last couple of months, and which, as we’ll
see, are indirectly connected.
The first is the saga of Kingfisher Airlines.
[Image Source] |
Until the so-called “economic
liberalisation” of the early 1990s, India had first two, and then three,
state-owned airlines: Air India, which serviced the overseas routes, Indian
Airlines, which flew domestically (and to a couple of heavily travelled
destinations in the vicinity, such as the Persian Gulf and Nepal) – and
Vayudoot, an ill-starred attempt at a feeder airline serving smaller
destinations, such as in eastern India. But with “economic liberalisation”, while
Vayudoot, er, crashed and burned, and Indian Airlines was forcibly merged with
Air India, a whole mess of other privately owned airlines entered the fray. A
lot of them, naturally, failed. At least one, Jet Airways, thrived, and
continues to thrive, but its finances were, and are, murky in the extreme.
There have been multiple and repeated accusations that Jet is a Mafia
money-laundering scheme, but for some strange reason no Indian government seems
at all eager to take a look at this. You’d almost imagine that Jet’s owners (or
“alleged owners” as one critic put it) are paying off successive regimes to look
the other way, but that surely can’t happen, can it? I mean, Indian politicians
can’t possibly be corrupt, can they? Of course not!
As the initial bloodletting among the
private airlines subsided, and the field stabilised a little, one Vijay Mallya
decided that he wanted to get into the business as well. Mallya was the heir to
a brewery empire – United Breweries, which makes Kingfisher Beer – and also a
politician, with a seat in the Upper House of the Indian Parliament and
multiple cronies across the political spectrum. He, of course, needed money to
start this airline, which was to be called Kingfisher, just like the beer. To
get this money he approached the nationalised Indian banks for loans.
Now, this might be surprising to you, but
normally banks aren’t all that eager to lend money unless they’re more than
certain they’re going to get it back. If I – and I am a perfectly solvent
citizen with a criminal record comprising two parking tickets – were to go
asking for a loan, as I have had to on a couple of occasions, they’d check my credit
rating, my tax returns, and my projected future income back, front and sideways
before telling me they’d be able to lend me a fraction of the amount I’d asked
for. And that’s even though I am a qualified dentist and the loans I was asking
for were entirely to do with running my clinic.
Not so for Mallya. Even though he had no,
zero, experience of running any kind of airline, the banks seemed to have
absolutely no problems pouring in money. Soon enough, he bought a fleet of
planes, hired staff by enticing them away from other airlines with much greater
salary offers, and started flying operations. And in order to make his airline
stand out from among the others, he started offering things that none of the
rest did, such as paying for booking on other airlines if one of his passengers
missed a flight. And in order to keep his employees happy, he continued to pay
them more than anyone else, invited them all to gala parties, and the like.
All this, of course, was on the money he’d
borrowed from the banks. Please remember this.
The airline business, contrary to what a
lot of people might imagine, is actually extremely capital-intensive, and
almost all earnings are ploughed right back into keeping things going. I’ve
read that the profit margin can be as low as 3%. Therefore, if one starts out
by increasing one’s expenses far beyond the competition, one must be able to
compensate by increased income, or one will be faced with bankruptcy. And with
the strictly limited paying capacity of the Great Indian Muddle Class, one
can’t increase income beyond a very small limit because the customer will
simply choose the cheaper alternatives. This is only logical; it doesn’t need
an airline executive to figure it out.
But, apparently, this was beyond the
cognitive capacity of a beer baron.
By the mid-2000s, then, Kingfisher Airlines
was so far into the red it would have been time to man the exits. But instead
of restructuring and taking a hard look at his business model, Mallya
apparently decided that the problem was that he wasn’t flying to enough
destinations. Kingfisher Airlines, at that time, was only cleared to fly within
the country; Mallya wanted international routes.
To do this, he decided to buy another
airline.
The airline he decided on was Air Deccan.
Air Deccan could be called the polar opposite of Kingfisher. Owned by a former
airline pilot, Captain Gopinath, it was ruthlessly efficient, extremely
cost-conscious, and provided a totally no-frills flying experience for its
passengers, keeping them coming with fares below anyone else’s. But Air Deccan
had one precious thing Mallya wanted – it had rights to fly to foreign
destinations. So he made an offer Gopinath apparently found impossible to
refuse, and bought the airline.
Once again, you do not buy an airline with
the contents of your piggy bank. Guess
where Mallya obtained the funds to purchase it?
Let’s play a little mind game. We’ll assume
that you’re a moneylender whose livelihood depends on earning interest on finds
you loan out. I come to you asking for money to set up a bread bakery, even
though I have no idea how to make a loaf of bread. Without the slightest
hesitation, you lend me the money I ask for.
After a couple of years, the bakery is on
the rocks, earning so little that after paying staff salaries and my suppliers
I have not enough left over to even start paying your loan back. Now, I decide
that the solution to my problems is to buy another
bakery, one which makes fancy cakes. I have failed at a business that depends
on making bread, and now I want to make fancy cakes as well. Right.
So I come to you, demanding even more money
to buy this cake baking business. What would be your response? You’re totally
going to throw open your cash drawer and give me wads of currency notes, aren’t
you? I think not.
Well, guess what happened with Kingfisher.
I bet you can’t. Oh, wait, you can. Anyway.
Earlier, Kingfisher had signed an agreement
with Deccan promising not to poach staff from it. Now, after buying the
airline, Mallya promised that he wouldn’t lay off anyone, even though this
would mean a considerable amount of duplication of personnel. How many separate
sets of baggage handlers and check in counter staff does an airline need at one
airport, anyway?
So this might have endeared Mallya to his
new employees, but it did nothing to help Kingfisher to get out of the red. Of
course, it did have those new international routes. They would make it money,
right?
Wrong. On the international circuit,
Kingfisher was suddenly faced with competition from the big boys, people like
British Airways and the like. More than obviously, they weren’t keen to see
their profits cut into by an upstart like Kingfisher. And, unlike Mallya, they
had the financial resources to undercut the competition and wait for it to
collapse.
Again – once again! – let me remind you
that all this was happening on the money
Mallya had borrowed from the nationalised banking sector. The taxpayer, in
effect, was financing all this.
Also, let me remind you that Kingfisher
Airlines was not Mallya’s main source
of income. That remained United Breweries and Kingfisher Beer.
By now, though, the banks were at last
becoming alarmed at Mallya’s failure to reimburse their loans. So they demanded
he start paying them back, or else.
Or else what? As it turned out, what it meant
was that or else the banks would enmesh themselves even more in the Kingfisher
wreck.
This was the proposal Mallya made the
banks: instead of paying back the loans, he would pay the banks back with
shares in Kingfisher Airlines. A magnificent offer indeed!
Let’s again go back to my bakery. I can’t
run a bread making business, I’ve just bought a cake shop on top of that, and
you want your money back. I instead suggest that I give you a sleeping
partnership in the (clearly failing) business. Would you accept?
Can you doubt that the banks did?
By 2012, Kingfisher had finally reached the
end of the road. It could no longer pay the staff the extravagant salaries to
which they’d grown accustomed. It abruptly declared a lockout, shut off the
fund flow, and ceased flight operations. The shares with which Mallya had paid
the banks became worthless scraps of electronic paper. The airline came to
ground, a flaming wreck.
The impact of this was felt, of course, by
the laid off staff only. Mallya himself had his cash flow from Kingfisher Beer
and other business concerns coming to him uninterrupted. But his erstwhile
employees had become so used to their inflated salaries, and so certain that
they would continue uninterrupted, that a lot of them had taken to living well
beyond their immediate income. They’d sent their children to the most expensive
private schools, taken huge personal loans to buy swank houses, and the like. Now
they were not only cut off from those funds, they couldn’t find jobs in the
airline sector, which had suffered even further contraction. The children left
the posh schools, the fancy houses went in distress sales, and several of them
even committed suicide.
But none of this touched Mallya. He
continued with the same old playboy lifestyle, being seen with the crème de la
crème of society, and nobody raised a peep. That is, until early this year,
when he made the tactical error of buying a professional cricket team. The
media, on the lookout for a sensation, suddenly began asking on what basis he
was buying this pro cricket team when he was so deep – to the tune of 90
thousand million rupees – in debt.
Try saying that to yourself, ninety
thousand million rupees. Try imagining the zeroes. I’ll wait.
Mallya’s response was anger. His debts, he
fumed, were a business between him and the banks. Nobody else had any right to
talk about them. But his political connections were so well known, and the
resentment against the moneyed class so high, that the media latched on to it
like manna from heaven. The banks, too, finally began to find their voice and
bleat for payment. The whole thing became a media circus, but the politicians,
strangely, stayed totally silent.
They were so silent, in fact, that if only
they hadn’t been obviously incorruptible and upright Indian politicians, you’d have thought they were terrified that
Mallya had information on them that he was threatening to spill.
You’d have by this time thought it likely
that Mallya was someone who had every reason in the world to run away from the
country, and that the obvious thing to do would be to seize his passport –
something eminently within the rights of the government – to prevent him from
leaving. No such luck. On 4th March, 17 banks, led by the State Bank
of India (in which, by the way, I have an account) moved the Supreme Court to
stop him leaving, and to have him arrested for the non-payment of the 90 thousand million rupees he owed. This was a pretty strange motion to make,
seeing that Mallya had already left the
country; he flew to Europe on 2nd March...first class.
Is it a surprise that he'd sold his stake and taken a huge amount as severance pay, leaving his former employees high and dry?
Where in Europe did he go? Which is the world’s acknowledged refuge
for financial criminals and oligarchs of all sorts, welcoming them and their
ill gotten gains with open arms?
London, of course.
While the government was still expostulating
that it was sure that Mallya would return, a journalist tracked him down in
England and interviewed him. He claimed that he “hoped” that he would be able
to return to India “someday”; anyone not totally brain dead would be able to
deduce that this “someday” would never come.
Mallya’s case is, basically, a perfect
illustration of the crony capitalist system, where robber barons are allowed to
do as they wish with public funds in return for kickbacks to enabling
politicians. If India chooses to embrace the capitalist system, it can’t
complain when unscrupulous criminals get away with murder; in this case, the
Kingfisher employees who were driven to suicide, for example. Capitalism
rewards greed and punishes principles; and Mallya is the perfect product of
that system. Possibly his only misfortune was that he’s Indian and not
Amerikastani; in the latter instance he could have applied for a bailout from
the blood soaked war criminal Barack Hussein Obama, and got it too.
Now here’s an interesting thing; books have
been written, literally, about the fall of Kingfisher, and yet they somehow all
manage to completely fail to mention this simple fact. So remarkable is this
omission that I can’t see it as anything but deliberate. Criticism of the
capitalist system is verboten in India today, except for Maoists and
environmentalists, who are, as the government has repeatedly certified, enemies
of the nation.
While in exile, and still making vague
noises about returning in April, Mallya made an offer to return part (much less
than half) of the loan amount to the banks. They turned the offer down. The
government then, very late in the day, cancelled Mallya’s passport. It did no
good, of course, in London; a place that shelters Russian oligarch crooks and
Chechen jihadi terrorists won’t be in a hurry to throw out someone who has
still immense personal funds at his disposal.
I am deliberately not suggesting that the Indian government sent back channel
messages to Britain to not put Mallya
on a plane back to India, even though, without a passport, he’d be an illegal
resident in England. That would imply that the Indian government is not interested in getting him back to
stand trial, which in turn means that the Indian government is complicit in his
crimes and fraud. That couldn’t be, could it? Right?
After his passport was revoked, Mallya finally announced that he would never return to India, something that should have set the media afire, but didn’t;
not a ripple. That was because by then the chattering heads on the telly were
eagerly discussing something else entirely...
...the affair of the Augusta Westland Helicopter Deal.
[Image Source] |
Before I begin on this, let me go over a
little bit of recent history. You’ll see why this is important in a minute.
Currently, India is ruled by the Hindunazi
BJP party of Prime Minister Narendrabhai Modi. It will be nothing new to
readers of this blog when I repeat that I despise both the party and Modi
himself; but I acknowledge that they genuinely won the last election, albeit
with just 31% of the vote. Modi may be vile, and he may have betrayed all the
dewy eyed expectations of his dupes, I mean voters – but he is a genuinely
elected prime minister, and when he issues orders, said orders come from
himself.
That was not the case, though, until 2014.
From 2004 to 2014, for ten whole years, India was ruled by the Congress Party.
The Congress was once genuinely socialist, though those days are long, long
gone; today, though non-Hindunazi, it’s even more right wing than the BJP where
Big Business is concerned. Also, the Congress is not really a political party;
like most Indian parties except the Communists and some of the Hindunazi
groups, it’s basically a private proprietorship.
The owners of the Congress are the Nehru-Gandhi
dynasty, currently represented by the Italian-born Sonia Gandhi and her son
Rahul. Though they own the party (quite literally – it’s an open secret that
the party’s funds are held in their names), they found a handy way of not
taking responsibility for the actions of the government their party led; when
they won the election in 2004, they installed a pliant, rubber-spined
nonentity, one Manmohan Singh, as prime minister. Manmohan Singh had only one
thing to commend him: he was totally colourless, utterly without any charisma
or ability, and had never, not even once, won any election in his life, not
even at the municipal level. He therefore had no political base whatsoever, and
could never, under any circumstances, emerge as a threat to the dynasty within
the party. It was known to everyone that all orders given by Manmohan Singh
were passed on to him by the dynasty; he himself was a rubber stamp in a blue
turban, no more.
The point, therefore, is that anything done
by him in an official capacity was merely as an instrument for the dynasty.
This has to be kept in mind.
Now, in 2010, the Air Force, for reasons
unknown, decided to purchase 12 helicopters for the specific purpose of
transporting top government officials, including the president and prime
minister. Why this purchase was decided on I’m sure I couldn’t tell you; all
these decades the purpose was served perfectly well by Russian-built Mi 8 and
Mi 17 helicopters, and there had never been any complaints about them.
Suddenly, though, the air force needed a squadron of luxury VIP transports.
[Of course, I could suggest to you that the
air force would never have decided on any such purchase without orders from the
government, in fact could not legally have decided on any such purchase without
orders from the government. I could then suggest to you that the “government”
in this case was the Gandhi dynasty. But they’d just be hypothetical
suggestions. Please don’t imagine I am accusing anyone! All Indian politicians,
even if they were born in Italy, are pure as the driven snow!]
Having decided on the purchase of these
machines, the air force then called for bids from manufacturers able to meet
the specifications demanded. One of these specifications was a service ceiling
of 6000 metres, presumably so that the big-shots being given rides in these
planes could visit high-altitude Himalayan destinations. At a meeting called by
the then Air Force chief, one Air Chief Marshal SP Tyagi, though, the decision
was abruptly made to reduce the ceiling requirement from 6000 metres to 4500.
That’s a whopping 25% reduction of the performance parameters, if you’re
keeping track; not a matter of a minor adjustment.
Now, there was the Italian company Finmeccanica,
which owns the Italian/British aviation company Augusta Westland. Its AW101
model was nowhere in the running for the contract as long as the ceiling
requirement was 6000 metres; as soon as it was reduced to 4500, though, not
only did it suddenly become eligible to bid, it magically won the contract at
once!
Let me take a moment to remind the reader
that this was under the Congress government, which is just a name for the
Gandhi dynasty. Let me further remind the reader that Sonia Gandhi is of
Italian origin, as is Finmeccanica. I would also venture to say that Italy is the
country that keeps cropping up in political controversies in India, more than
all other nations put together, ever since a (by the standards of the time)
giant scandal over the purchase of Bofors howitzers by the army back in the
late 1980s. An Italian crony of the Gandhis, Ottavio Quattrocchhi, was among
those implicated in getting kickbacks from slush funds in the deal; the Gandhi
dynasty helped him skip the country, and made sure he was never extradited back
to face trial as long as he lived.
I am sure it’s a total coincidence that
another Italian company should be involved this time round, though. Please keep
in mind that I am totally not suggesting Sonia Gandhi used her power to
influence the deal in favour of another Italian group. That would mean she was dishonest,
and, of course, that can’t be true.
Now, the deal with Augusta Westland was
signed in 2010. By early 2013, though a huge advance had been paid, not a
single helicopter had been delivered. Manmohan Singh’s “government” was in dire
trouble, staring at defeat in the elections due the following year. It was at
that stage that a commission alleged massive bribery in the deal, with payoffs
being made to, among others, SP Tyagi and his relatives. Finmeccanica’s CEO,
one Giuseppe Orsi, was arrested in Italy on bribery charges, the government
belatedly cancelled the contract with Augusta Westland, and arrested an infamous crooked arms dealer who had served as a middleman in the deal.
[Said arms dealer and his Romanian wife are
incarcerated in Delhi’s Tihar jail, but apparently enjoy such facilities as
candlelight dinners together every week. I can’t even recall when I last had a
candlelight dinner, assuming I ever had one, unless it was when the power went
out while I was eating. The perks of being a rich jailbird!]
And, remarkably, one day after the Central Bureau of Investigation submitted
charges about the corruption in the deal in 2013, another
middleman, a Brit called James Christian Michel, was allowed to escape the country. Isn’t
it remarkable how people are magically permitted to leave in the nick of time?
Quattrocchhi, Michel...Vijay Mallya?
Time passed. The Congress was wiped out in
the 2014 elections, being reduced to just 44 seats. Modi took over among high
hopes, and dashed them so quickly that his worshippers are still unable to
believe their eyes. Meanwhile, Orsi was acquitted of bribery by a court in
Italy, and it seemed that the Augusta Westland tale had reached a dead end.
That is, until now, when another Italian
court overturned the acquittal of Orsi, and exposed a lot of dirt that had been
ignored so far; including the fact that Augusta Westland had earmarked funds to
influence air force officers and politicians to sway the deal in its favour.
Among said politicians named by the court were several dynasty flunkies, not to
speak of, oh heavens, Sonia Gandhi and her son themselves!
Can you doubt that the Hindunazis seized on
this like a starving moderate cannibal headhunter leaping on a dead Syrian
soldier’s heart?
Also, Augusta Westland seems to have
earmarked funds to pay off the Indian media to “look the other way”, according
to the Italian court. Apparently their silence was bought for three years, but
the money has run dry now.
No tears need be wasted on the Congress, which, if you've been paying attention so far, you'll conclude is even more despicable than the Hindunazis. Its response has basically been bluster, meant for one purpose only – to protect the dynasty. All other
considerations are secondary. The bluster has been spectacularly unsuccessful,
but that doesn’t really matter since everyone knows perfectly well that nothing
will come of it in the end. When everyone’s hand is in the till, if one thief
gets punished, the other might get his
hand chopped off tomorrow.
Meanwhile, the Hindunazis have used this
opportunity not just to quietly bury the Kingfisher controversy, but to cover
up their continuing agenda of anti-Muslim fascism. Indian writers in the Urdu
language have been ordered to sign an oath of loyalty; apparently Urdu (one of
the official languages of the Indian Union) is an anti-national language now. Why not simply, you know, ban it outright?
The next date to watch is 19th
May, when the results of multiple state elections will be declared. If the
Hindunazis are successful, they will assume their tactics are working, and will
continue with them. If, as I anticipate, they are badly defeated everywhere,
they will conclude they are not being fascistic enough, and will intensify
their campaign of hatred. The effete, corrupt Congress will in either case merely
try to protect the dynasty, and wait for 2019 and a fresh shot at power.
This has been your latest report from Hindunazistan.
Stay tuned for fresh bulletins as and when they become available.
The mind boggles.
ReplyDeleteBut you write so entertainingly, it almost seems worthwhile.
ReplyDelete